Carbon calculator

Developed to meet the specific needs of the beverage industry

Guidance notes
Recognising the environmental issues, shippers globally are demanding a better understanding of CO2 emissions relating specifically to beverage transportation.

A large amount of conflicting and generalised data is available on the subject of freight transport emissions.

JF Hillebrand has analysed data from numerous sources and has liaised with the Wine & Spirit Trade Association, also considering research undertaken by the Federation International Vins & Spirits (FIVS), in developing a tool to enable the beverage industry to reasonably calculate and compare estimates for emissions based on routing, mode, equipment type and quantity shipped.

The JF Hillebrand carbon calculator uses the following calculations:-

Road Trailers (HGV's); emission calculation based on 1569 g Co2 per Km: (source; continuing survey of roads goods transport 2003: NAEI - NETCEN 2005 - based on load correction factors taken from CORPET III) payload 25 tons, therefore 63g CO2/tkm.

Rail – intermodal – Various European sources including WRI - WBCSD 2003, INFRAS 2004, IFEU 2005, FIVS 2007 and the Rail Emissions model (AEA Technology 2001) lead JF Hillebrand to establish a figure of 26.4g CO2/tkm.

Sea freight – containerised – Deep sea - CO2 emissions based on information sourced from DEFRA 2005 and FIVS lead JF Hillebrand to establish a figure of 14g CO2/tkm.

Seafreight – containerised – Coastal - based on figures sourced from DEFRA 2005 and FIVS lead JF Hillebrand to establish a figure of 37g CO2/tkm.

Ro-ro – trailers - based on figures sourced from DEFRA 2005 and FIVS lead JF Hillebrand to establish a figure of 56g CO2/tkm.

Sea freight – operating reefer containers – at the time of publication (May 2008), very limited data is available on the additional emissions from operating reefer equipment. Research by the American Association of Wine Economists, published October 2007, indicates a 28% increase in emissions for operating reefers, compared to non-reefer container equipment. JF Hillebrand has therefore utilised a figure of 17g CO2/tkm.

Source for Nautical miles distances: http://www.searates.com/reference/portdistance/

Air freight
JF Hillebrand’s Carbon Calculator does not include air freight calculations. Users are referred to the DEFRA Guidelines for Company Reporting on Greenhouse Gas Emissions (DEFRA 2001), which gives a value of 570gCO2/tkm for short haul flights, and 1580gCO2/tkm for long haul (more than 500 kms) flights.

JF Hillebrand has no interest in promoting particular transport modes or routings and has taken an entirely impartial approach in developing its carbon calculation tool.

This Carbon Calculation tool provides the user with an estimate of emissions. We believe it represents an objective, reasonable and conservative assessment of emissions from what analysts agree is one of the most complex elements of the beverage supply chain.

Using JF Hillebrand’s carbon calculator
The principle calculation is based on transportation between nodal points (generally ports or railheads). The user then enters the road distance to the origin node from the loading point, and from the destination node to the final delivery point.

The carbon emission is determined for a full load consignment, from loading to delivery point, adding the emissions generated on the three transport legs. The CO2 emission is also shown per litre of wine transported, enabling comparison of emissions via different transport modes and equipment types, including shipment in bulk v packaged.

In all cases, the total litres of the consignment must be entered.

Steps in establishing the CO2 emission of a given movement:- 

Amending any of the above selections will clear the subsequent fields.

Please note all distances are calculated on a one way basis, with the exception of transport movements from Mendoza in Argentina, the vast majority of which involve a round-trip from Buenos Aires and this is therefore reflected in the carbon calculator. Users are advised to contact your local JF Hillebrand office for any advice on what to include as an empty running provision/factor.

Equipment Types
The following equipment types are accommodated within the tool, as appropriate:-

20ft Container (dry or bulk)
40ft Container
40ft Reefer Container
13.6m trailer

Nominal payloads / nominal total litres
The carbon calculator assumes equipment fill is optimised, based on cubic capacity in the base of 20ft containers and applicable national legal maximum payloads in the case of other equipment types.    

 

Equipment
Country Transport Mode Nominal 13.6m trailer 20ft container 40ft container 40ft reefer
Argentina
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Australia
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Austria



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Belgium



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Bulgaria
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Chile
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
China
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Cyprus
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Denmark
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Estonia
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Finland
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
France



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
19800
37
13860
23.5
23280
39.5
Germany



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
24
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23
Greece
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Hong Kong
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Hungary
Rail
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
24
Ireland
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Italy





Rail
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
24
Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
23280
39.5
Japan
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Latvia
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Netherlands



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
New Zealand
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Norway
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Poland
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Portugal



Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Romania
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Russia
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Singapore
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
South Africa
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
South Korea
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Spain





Rail
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
24
Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Sweden
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Switzerland
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Taiwan
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
Thailand
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
12680
21.5
UK





Rail
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
24
Road
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
13860
25
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
Uruguay
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
13860
23.5
USA
Sea
Total Litres
Payload (tonnes)
9900
18.5
11800
20
10600
18